Laszlo Pacsay vs Sandor Varga
HUN-chT2 9596, date unknown · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (E64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Laszlo Pacsay vs Sandor Varga with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Laszlo Pacsay (2270)
- Black
- Sandor Varga (2275)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- HUN-chT2 9596
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (E64)
About this chess game
This chess game between Laszlo Pacsay (2270) and Sandor Varga (2275) was played at HUN-chT2 9596 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (E64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Laszlo Pacsay games or Sandor Varga games? This Laszlo Pacsay vs Sandor Varga encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Laszlo Pacsay vs Sandor Varga?
Laszlo Pacsay vs Sandor Varga finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Laszlo Pacsay vs Sandor Varga?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (ECO E64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Laszlo Pacsay vs Sandor Varga, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.