Daniel Pacheco vs Leandro Perdomo
4. Floripa Open 2018, 2018 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (E75).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Pacheco vs Leandro Perdomo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Pacheco (2241)
- Black
- Leandro Perdomo (2449)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 4. Floripa Open 2018
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (E75)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Pacheco (2241) and Leandro Perdomo (2449) was played at 4. Floripa Open 2018 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (E75). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Pacheco games or Leandro Perdomo games? This Daniel Pacheco vs Leandro Perdomo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Pacheco vs Leandro Perdomo?
Daniel Pacheco vs Leandro Perdomo (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Leandro Perdomo.
What opening was played in Daniel Pacheco vs Leandro Perdomo?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (ECO E75).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Pacheco vs Leandro Perdomo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.