Henk-Jan Paalman vs Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink
2015 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (D48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Henk-Jan Paalman vs Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Henk-Jan Paalman (2112)
- Black
- Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink (2162)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (D48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Henk-Jan Paalman (2112) and Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink (2162) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (D48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Henk-Jan Paalman games or Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink games? This Henk-Jan Paalman vs Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Henk-Jan Paalman vs Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink?
Henk-Jan Paalman vs Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Henk-Jan Paalman vs Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (ECO D48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Henk-Jan Paalman vs Elmar, Dr. Doennebrink, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.