Hans-Dieter Päßler vs Abir Har-Even
VWC3/pr04, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hans-Dieter Päßler vs Abir Har-Even with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hans-Dieter Päßler (2152)
- Black
- Abir Har-Even (2062)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- VWC3/pr04
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hans-Dieter Päßler (2152) and Abir Har-Even (2062) was played at VWC3/pr04 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hans-Dieter Päßler games or Abir Har-Even games? This Hans-Dieter Päßler vs Abir Har-Even encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hans-Dieter Päßler vs Abir Har-Even?
Hans-Dieter Päßler vs Abir Har-Even (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Abir Har-Even.
What opening was played in Hans-Dieter Päßler vs Abir Har-Even?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (ECO A89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hans-Dieter Päßler vs Abir Har-Even, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.