Corentin Ozenne vs Pierre Carpentier
2009 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Corentin Ozenne vs Pierre Carpentier with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Corentin Ozenne (2044)
- Black
- Pierre Carpentier (2207)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Corentin Ozenne (2044) and Pierre Carpentier (2207) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Corentin Ozenne games or Pierre Carpentier games? This Corentin Ozenne vs Pierre Carpentier encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Corentin Ozenne vs Pierre Carpentier?
Corentin Ozenne vs Pierre Carpentier (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Pierre Carpentier.
What opening was played in Corentin Ozenne vs Pierre Carpentier?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Corentin Ozenne vs Pierre Carpentier, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.