Ahmet Ozen vs Kaan Kanli
Turkish Bank Chess League 2012, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ahmet Ozen vs Kaan Kanli with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ahmet Ozen (1508)
- Black
- Kaan Kanli (2002)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Turkish Bank Chess League 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ahmet Ozen (1508) and Kaan Kanli (2002) was played at Turkish Bank Chess League 2012 in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ahmet Ozen games or Kaan Kanli games? This Ahmet Ozen vs Kaan Kanli encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ahmet Ozen vs Kaan Kanli?
Ahmet Ozen vs Kaan Kanli (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Kaan Kanli.
What opening was played in Ahmet Ozen vs Kaan Kanli?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (ECO C59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ahmet Ozen vs Kaan Kanli, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.