Serhan Berat Ozdemir vs Artem Babakekhyan
2013 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Serhan Berat Ozdemir vs Artem Babakekhyan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Serhan Berat Ozdemir (1641)
- Black
- Artem Babakekhyan (1510)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Serhan Berat Ozdemir (1641) and Artem Babakekhyan (1510) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Serhan Berat Ozdemir games or Artem Babakekhyan games? This Serhan Berat Ozdemir vs Artem Babakekhyan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Serhan Berat Ozdemir vs Artem Babakekhyan?
Serhan Berat Ozdemir vs Artem Babakekhyan (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Artem Babakekhyan.
What opening was played in Serhan Berat Ozdemir vs Artem Babakekhyan?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (ECO B76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Serhan Berat Ozdemir vs Artem Babakekhyan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.