Maili-Jade Ouellet vs Michelle M Fisher
Olympiad Women 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maili-Jade Ouellet vs Michelle M Fisher with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maili-Jade Ouellet (1992)
- Black
- Michelle M Fisher (1701)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Olympiad Women 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maili-Jade Ouellet (1992) and Michelle M Fisher (1701) was played at Olympiad Women 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maili-Jade Ouellet games or Michelle M Fisher games? This Maili-Jade Ouellet vs Michelle M Fisher encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maili-Jade Ouellet vs Michelle M Fisher?
Maili-Jade Ouellet vs Michelle M Fisher (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Maili-Jade Ouellet.
What opening was played in Maili-Jade Ouellet vs Michelle M Fisher?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maili-Jade Ouellet vs Michelle M Fisher, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.