David Ottosen vs Rodolfo Arias Formoso
Ch Costa Rica (qualification), 2005 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Ottosen vs Rodolfo Arias Formoso with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Ottosen (2113)
- Black
- Rodolfo Arias Formoso (2173)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Ch Costa Rica (qualification)
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Ottosen (2113) and Rodolfo Arias Formoso (2173) was played at Ch Costa Rica (qualification) in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Ottosen games or Rodolfo Arias Formoso games? This David Ottosen vs Rodolfo Arias Formoso encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Ottosen vs Rodolfo Arias Formoso?
David Ottosen vs Rodolfo Arias Formoso (2005) finished 1–0, a win for David Ottosen.
What opening was played in David Ottosen vs Rodolfo Arias Formoso?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Ottosen vs Rodolfo Arias Formoso, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.