Thomas Otterson vs Bart Vermeulen
date unknown · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation (E54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Otterson vs Bart Vermeulen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Otterson
- Black
- Bart Vermeulen (1770)
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation (E54)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Otterson and Bart Vermeulen (1770) was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation (E54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Otterson games or Bart Vermeulen games? This Thomas Otterson vs Bart Vermeulen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Otterson vs Bart Vermeulen?
Thomas Otterson vs Bart Vermeulen finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Thomas Otterson vs Bart Vermeulen?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation (ECO E54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Otterson vs Bart Vermeulen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.