Wolfgang Ottenweller vs Andrew Trickey
TE.2007.P.02406, 2007 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit (D08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wolfgang Ottenweller vs Andrew Trickey with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wolfgang Ottenweller (1886)
- Black
- Andrew Trickey (1717)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TE.2007.P.02406
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit (D08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wolfgang Ottenweller (1886) and Andrew Trickey (1717) was played at TE.2007.P.02406 in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit (D08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wolfgang Ottenweller games or Andrew Trickey games? This Wolfgang Ottenweller vs Andrew Trickey encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wolfgang Ottenweller vs Andrew Trickey?
Wolfgang Ottenweller vs Andrew Trickey (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Wolfgang Ottenweller.
What opening was played in Wolfgang Ottenweller vs Andrew Trickey?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit (ECO D08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wolfgang Ottenweller vs Andrew Trickey, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.