Weimar Andres Ospina vs Leonardo Clavijo Romero
17. American Continental, 2024 · Result 0–1 · Scandinavian Defense (B01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Weimar Andres Ospina vs Leonardo Clavijo Romero with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Weimar Andres Ospina (2063)
- Black
- Leonardo Clavijo Romero (1902)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 17. American Continental
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Scandinavian Defense (B01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Weimar Andres Ospina (2063) and Leonardo Clavijo Romero (1902) was played at 17. American Continental in 2024 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Scandinavian Defense (B01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Weimar Andres Ospina games or Leonardo Clavijo Romero games? This Weimar Andres Ospina vs Leonardo Clavijo Romero encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Scandinavian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Weimar Andres Ospina vs Leonardo Clavijo Romero?
Weimar Andres Ospina vs Leonardo Clavijo Romero (2024) finished 0–1, a win for Leonardo Clavijo Romero.
What opening was played in Weimar Andres Ospina vs Leonardo Clavijo Romero?
The game opened with the Scandinavian Defense (ECO B01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Weimar Andres Ospina vs Leonardo Clavijo Romero, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.