Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz vs Juergen Schaedler
2014 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz vs Juergen Schaedler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz (2284)
- Black
- Juergen Schaedler (2082)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz (2284) and Juergen Schaedler (2082) was played in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz games or Juergen Schaedler games? This Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz vs Juergen Schaedler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz vs Juergen Schaedler?
Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz vs Juergen Schaedler (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz.
What opening was played in Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz vs Juergen Schaedler?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (ECO B28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcos Eduardo Osorio Ortiz vs Juergen Schaedler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.