Jacek Oskulski vs Andrei Maiorov
EU M corr, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line (A64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacek Oskulski vs Andrei Maiorov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacek Oskulski (2140)
- Black
- Andrei Maiorov (1457)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- EU M corr
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line (A64)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacek Oskulski (2140) and Andrei Maiorov (1457) was played at EU M corr and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line (A64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacek Oskulski games or Andrei Maiorov games? This Jacek Oskulski vs Andrei Maiorov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacek Oskulski vs Andrei Maiorov?
Jacek Oskulski vs Andrei Maiorov finished 1–0, a win for Jacek Oskulski.
What opening was played in Jacek Oskulski vs Andrei Maiorov?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line (ECO A64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacek Oskulski vs Andrei Maiorov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.