Stephen L A Orton vs David G Levens
GBR-ch100 Senior, 2013 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stephen L A Orton vs David G Levens with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stephen L A Orton (2175)
- Black
- David G Levens (1982)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- GBR-ch100 Senior
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B78)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stephen L A Orton (2175) and David G Levens (1982) was played at GBR-ch100 Senior in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stephen L A Orton games or David G Levens games? This Stephen L A Orton vs David G Levens encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stephen L A Orton vs David G Levens?
Stephen L A Orton vs David G Levens (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Stephen L A Orton vs David G Levens?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (ECO B78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stephen L A Orton vs David G Levens, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.