Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos vs Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano
2015 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Classical Variation (C11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos vs Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos (1955)
- Black
- Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano (1547)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation (C11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos (1955) and Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano (1547) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation (C11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos games or Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano games? This Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos vs Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos vs Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano?
Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos vs Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos.
What opening was played in Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos vs Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation (ECO C11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Luis Ortiz Amenos vs Miguel Eduardo Mendez Manturano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.