Max Orteu Capdevila vs Adrian Jimenez Ruano
TCh-CAT Gp1 2016, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Max Orteu Capdevila vs Adrian Jimenez Ruano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Max Orteu Capdevila (2019)
- Black
- Adrian Jimenez Ruano (2089)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- TCh-CAT Gp1 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Max Orteu Capdevila (2019) and Adrian Jimenez Ruano (2089) was played at TCh-CAT Gp1 2016 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Max Orteu Capdevila games or Adrian Jimenez Ruano games? This Max Orteu Capdevila vs Adrian Jimenez Ruano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Max Orteu Capdevila vs Adrian Jimenez Ruano?
Max Orteu Capdevila vs Adrian Jimenez Ruano (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Max Orteu Capdevila vs Adrian Jimenez Ruano?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (ECO B90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Max Orteu Capdevila vs Adrian Jimenez Ruano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.