Jaime Ortega Choque vs Quinonez Gunther William Iturry
2012 · Result ½–½ · Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaime Ortega Choque vs Quinonez Gunther William Iturry with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaime Ortega Choque (1975)
- Black
- Quinonez Gunther William Iturry (2236)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaime Ortega Choque (1975) and Quinonez Gunther William Iturry (2236) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaime Ortega Choque games or Quinonez Gunther William Iturry games? This Jaime Ortega Choque vs Quinonez Gunther William Iturry encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaime Ortega Choque vs Quinonez Gunther William Iturry?
Jaime Ortega Choque vs Quinonez Gunther William Iturry (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jaime Ortega Choque vs Quinonez Gunther William Iturry?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (ECO A43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaime Ortega Choque vs Quinonez Gunther William Iturry, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.