Jaidiber Orozco Arango vs Luis Fernando Cano
2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaidiber Orozco Arango vs Luis Fernando Cano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaidiber Orozco Arango (1851)
- Black
- Luis Fernando Cano (2241)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaidiber Orozco Arango (1851) and Luis Fernando Cano (2241) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaidiber Orozco Arango games or Luis Fernando Cano games? This Jaidiber Orozco Arango vs Luis Fernando Cano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaidiber Orozco Arango vs Luis Fernando Cano?
Jaidiber Orozco Arango vs Luis Fernando Cano (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jaidiber Orozco Arango.
What opening was played in Jaidiber Orozco Arango vs Luis Fernando Cano?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaidiber Orozco Arango vs Luis Fernando Cano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.