Brendon O'Neill vs Richard Zheng
Montreal CC Ch, 2018 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Brendon O'Neill vs Richard Zheng with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Brendon O'Neill (1710)
- Black
- Richard Zheng (1991)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Montreal CC Ch
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Brendon O'Neill (1710) and Richard Zheng (1991) was played at Montreal CC Ch in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Brendon O'Neill games or Richard Zheng games? This Brendon O'Neill vs Richard Zheng encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Brendon O'Neill vs Richard Zheng?
Brendon O'Neill vs Richard Zheng (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Richard Zheng.
What opening was played in Brendon O'Neill vs Richard Zheng?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (ECO C09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Brendon O'Neill vs Richard Zheng, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.