Niels Ondersteijn vs John Van Baarle
35. Taminco Open, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Niels Ondersteijn vs John Van Baarle with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Niels Ondersteijn (2314)
- Black
- John Van Baarle (2209)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 35. Taminco Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86)
About this chess game
This chess game between Niels Ondersteijn (2314) and John Van Baarle (2209) was played at 35. Taminco Open in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Niels Ondersteijn games or John Van Baarle games? This Niels Ondersteijn vs John Van Baarle encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Niels Ondersteijn vs John Van Baarle?
Niels Ondersteijn vs John Van Baarle (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Niels Ondersteijn.
What opening was played in Niels Ondersteijn vs John Van Baarle?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (ECO C86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Niels Ondersteijn vs John Van Baarle, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.