Marco Antonio Omella Sieso vs Emilio Reina Guerra
ESP/W/P/106 (ESP), 2019 · Result 0–1 · Rapport-Jobava System (D01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marco Antonio Omella Sieso vs Emilio Reina Guerra with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marco Antonio Omella Sieso (1769)
- Black
- Emilio Reina Guerra (2057)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ESP/W/P/106 (ESP)
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Rapport-Jobava System (D01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marco Antonio Omella Sieso (1769) and Emilio Reina Guerra (2057) was played at ESP/W/P/106 (ESP) in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Rapport-Jobava System (D01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marco Antonio Omella Sieso games or Emilio Reina Guerra games? This Marco Antonio Omella Sieso vs Emilio Reina Guerra encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Rapport-Jobava System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marco Antonio Omella Sieso vs Emilio Reina Guerra?
Marco Antonio Omella Sieso vs Emilio Reina Guerra (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Emilio Reina Guerra.
What opening was played in Marco Antonio Omella Sieso vs Emilio Reina Guerra?
The game opened with the Rapport-Jobava System (ECO D01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marco Antonio Omella Sieso vs Emilio Reina Guerra, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.