Artem Omelja vs Serghei Gostev
Kiev Spring 2011, 2011 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Artem Omelja vs Serghei Gostev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Artem Omelja (2298)
- Black
- Serghei Gostev (2355)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Kiev Spring 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Artem Omelja (2298) and Serghei Gostev (2355) was played at Kiev Spring 2011 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Artem Omelja games or Serghei Gostev games? This Artem Omelja vs Serghei Gostev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Artem Omelja vs Serghei Gostev?
Artem Omelja vs Serghei Gostev (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Artem Omelja.
What opening was played in Artem Omelja vs Serghei Gostev?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Artem Omelja vs Serghei Gostev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.