Femi OLUWASEYITAN vs Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE
2013 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Femi OLUWASEYITAN vs Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Femi OLUWASEYITAN (2160)
- Black
- Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE (2179)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Femi OLUWASEYITAN (2160) and Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE (2179) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Femi OLUWASEYITAN games or Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE games? This Femi OLUWASEYITAN vs Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Femi OLUWASEYITAN vs Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE?
Femi OLUWASEYITAN vs Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE.
What opening was played in Femi OLUWASEYITAN vs Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (ECO E65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Femi OLUWASEYITAN vs Abiola Daniel AKINSEYE, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.