Robert Mcligeyo Oluka vs Emthe Solskinnsbakk
Stjernens høstturnering 2025, 2025 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Mcligeyo Oluka vs Emthe Solskinnsbakk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Mcligeyo Oluka (2091)
- Black
- Emthe Solskinnsbakk (1743)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Stjernens høstturnering 2025
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Mcligeyo Oluka (2091) and Emthe Solskinnsbakk (1743) was played at Stjernens høstturnering 2025 in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Mcligeyo Oluka games or Emthe Solskinnsbakk games? This Robert Mcligeyo Oluka vs Emthe Solskinnsbakk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Mcligeyo Oluka vs Emthe Solskinnsbakk?
Robert Mcligeyo Oluka vs Emthe Solskinnsbakk (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Robert Mcligeyo Oluka.
What opening was played in Robert Mcligeyo Oluka vs Emthe Solskinnsbakk?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Mcligeyo Oluka vs Emthe Solskinnsbakk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.