Marek Olszewski vs Robert Wojciechowski
2007 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marek Olszewski vs Robert Wojciechowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marek Olszewski (2049)
- Black
- Robert Wojciechowski (1904)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marek Olszewski (2049) and Robert Wojciechowski (1904) was played in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marek Olszewski games or Robert Wojciechowski games? This Marek Olszewski vs Robert Wojciechowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marek Olszewski vs Robert Wojciechowski?
Marek Olszewski vs Robert Wojciechowski (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Marek Olszewski vs Robert Wojciechowski?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (ECO B11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marek Olszewski vs Robert Wojciechowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.