Jaroslav Olsar vs Singh Malik Jatin
CZE Ch, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaroslav Olsar vs Singh Malik Jatin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaroslav Olsar (2317)
- Black
- Singh Malik Jatin (2232)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CZE Ch
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaroslav Olsar (2317) and Singh Malik Jatin (2232) was played at CZE Ch in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaroslav Olsar games or Singh Malik Jatin games? This Jaroslav Olsar vs Singh Malik Jatin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaroslav Olsar vs Singh Malik Jatin?
Jaroslav Olsar vs Singh Malik Jatin (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Singh Malik Jatin.
What opening was played in Jaroslav Olsar vs Singh Malik Jatin?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (ECO B93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaroslav Olsar vs Singh Malik Jatin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.