Mattis Olofsson-Dolk vs Lars 1965 Svensson
Deltalift Open 2012, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation (B04).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mattis Olofsson-Dolk vs Lars 1965 Svensson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mattis Olofsson-Dolk (2009)
- Black
- Lars 1965 Svensson (1983)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Deltalift Open 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation (B04)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mattis Olofsson-Dolk (2009) and Lars 1965 Svensson (1983) was played at Deltalift Open 2012 in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation (B04). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mattis Olofsson-Dolk games or Lars 1965 Svensson games? This Mattis Olofsson-Dolk vs Lars 1965 Svensson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mattis Olofsson-Dolk vs Lars 1965 Svensson?
Mattis Olofsson-Dolk vs Lars 1965 Svensson (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Lars 1965 Svensson.
What opening was played in Mattis Olofsson-Dolk vs Lars 1965 Svensson?
The game opened with the Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation (ECO B04).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mattis Olofsson-Dolk vs Lars 1965 Svensson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.