Guilherme Martins G Oliveira vs Jose Antonio Dos Santos
2014 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Guilherme Martins G Oliveira vs Jose Antonio Dos Santos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Guilherme Martins G Oliveira (1822)
- Black
- Jose Antonio Dos Santos (1726)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Guilherme Martins G Oliveira (1822) and Jose Antonio Dos Santos (1726) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Guilherme Martins G Oliveira games or Jose Antonio Dos Santos games? This Guilherme Martins G Oliveira vs Jose Antonio Dos Santos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Guilherme Martins G Oliveira vs Jose Antonio Dos Santos?
Guilherme Martins G Oliveira vs Jose Antonio Dos Santos (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Guilherme Martins G Oliveira vs Jose Antonio Dos Santos?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Guilherme Martins G Oliveira vs Jose Antonio Dos Santos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.