Antoni Oliva Llorens vs Antonio Bonell Mitjans
2013 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antoni Oliva Llorens vs Antonio Bonell Mitjans with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antoni Oliva Llorens (1933)
- Black
- Antonio Bonell Mitjans (2099)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antoni Oliva Llorens (1933) and Antonio Bonell Mitjans (2099) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antoni Oliva Llorens games or Antonio Bonell Mitjans games? This Antoni Oliva Llorens vs Antonio Bonell Mitjans encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antoni Oliva Llorens vs Antonio Bonell Mitjans?
Antoni Oliva Llorens vs Antonio Bonell Mitjans (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Antonio Bonell Mitjans.
What opening was played in Antoni Oliva Llorens vs Antonio Bonell Mitjans?
The game opened with the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (ECO A08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antoni Oliva Llorens vs Antonio Bonell Mitjans, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.