Nikolay Olenin vs Alexander Kononenko
2009 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nikolay Olenin vs Alexander Kononenko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nikolay Olenin (2326)
- Black
- Alexander Kononenko (2256)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nikolay Olenin (2326) and Alexander Kononenko (2256) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nikolay Olenin games or Alexander Kononenko games? This Nikolay Olenin vs Alexander Kononenko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nikolay Olenin vs Alexander Kononenko?
Nikolay Olenin vs Alexander Kononenko (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Nikolay Olenin vs Alexander Kononenko?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nikolay Olenin vs Alexander Kononenko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.