Dmitriy Olenichev vs Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich
Yuzhny Open, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dmitriy Olenichev vs Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dmitriy Olenichev (2271)
- Black
- Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich (2520)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Yuzhny Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dmitriy Olenichev (2271) and Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich (2520) was played at Yuzhny Open in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dmitriy Olenichev games or Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich games? This Dmitriy Olenichev vs Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dmitriy Olenichev vs Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich?
Dmitriy Olenichev vs Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich.
What opening was played in Dmitriy Olenichev vs Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (ECO C48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dmitriy Olenichev vs Saveliy Vl Bogdanovich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.