Miguel Olaizola vs Mandy Marie Ziegel
Lichtenberger Sommer 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Olaizola vs Mandy Marie Ziegel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Olaizola (1804)
- Black
- Mandy Marie Ziegel (1582)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Lichtenberger Sommer 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Olaizola (1804) and Mandy Marie Ziegel (1582) was played at Lichtenberger Sommer 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Olaizola games or Mandy Marie Ziegel games? This Miguel Olaizola vs Mandy Marie Ziegel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Olaizola vs Mandy Marie Ziegel?
Miguel Olaizola vs Mandy Marie Ziegel (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Miguel Olaizola.
What opening was played in Miguel Olaizola vs Mandy Marie Ziegel?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (ECO D55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Olaizola vs Mandy Marie Ziegel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.