Alexander Okrajek vs Siegfried Klimpel
Bad Woerishofen 2017 - Senioren, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Okrajek vs Siegfried Klimpel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Okrajek (2213)
- Black
- Siegfried Klimpel (1865)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Bad Woerishofen 2017 - Senioren
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Okrajek (2213) and Siegfried Klimpel (1865) was played at Bad Woerishofen 2017 - Senioren in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Okrajek games or Siegfried Klimpel games? This Alexander Okrajek vs Siegfried Klimpel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Okrajek vs Siegfried Klimpel?
Alexander Okrajek vs Siegfried Klimpel (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Okrajek.
What opening was played in Alexander Okrajek vs Siegfried Klimpel?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (ECO B28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Okrajek vs Siegfried Klimpel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.