Christopher Okaitei vs Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson
2016 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (D94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Christopher Okaitei vs Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Christopher Okaitei (1559)
- Black
- Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson (1890)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (D94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Christopher Okaitei (1559) and Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson (1890) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (D94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Christopher Okaitei games or Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson games? This Christopher Okaitei vs Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Christopher Okaitei vs Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson?
Christopher Okaitei vs Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson.
What opening was played in Christopher Okaitei vs Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (ECO D94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Christopher Okaitei vs Edward Nii Lamptey Thompson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.