Julius Ohler vs Lars Kasueschke
34. Staufer-Open 2024, 2024 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Julius Ohler vs Lars Kasueschke with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Julius Ohler (2213)
- Black
- Lars Kasueschke (2044)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 34. Staufer-Open 2024
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Julius Ohler (2213) and Lars Kasueschke (2044) was played at 34. Staufer-Open 2024 in 2024 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Julius Ohler games or Lars Kasueschke games? This Julius Ohler vs Lars Kasueschke encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Julius Ohler vs Lars Kasueschke?
Julius Ohler vs Lars Kasueschke (2024) finished 1–0, a win for Julius Ohler.
What opening was played in Julius Ohler vs Lars Kasueschke?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Julius Ohler vs Lars Kasueschke, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.