Tom Officier vs Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov
CL/2012/C7, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tom Officier vs Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tom Officier (2003)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CL/2012/C7
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tom Officier (2003) and Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov was played at CL/2012/C7 in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tom Officier games or Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov games? This Tom Officier vs Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tom Officier vs Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov?
Tom Officier vs Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov.
What opening was played in Tom Officier vs Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (ECO B60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tom Officier vs Kirill Vladimirovic Dzhafarov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.