Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea vs Santiago Garcia Yera
2014 · Result 1–0 · Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea vs Santiago Garcia Yera with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea (1988)
- Black
- Santiago Garcia Yera (1723)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea (1988) and Santiago Garcia Yera (1723) was played in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea games or Santiago Garcia Yera games? This Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea vs Santiago Garcia Yera encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea vs Santiago Garcia Yera?
Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea vs Santiago Garcia Yera (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea.
What opening was played in Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea vs Santiago Garcia Yera?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (ECO B09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Jose Ocon Galilea vs Santiago Garcia Yera, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.