Alexandra Obolentseva vs Andrea Jausas Lopez
2011 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandra Obolentseva vs Andrea Jausas Lopez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandra Obolentseva (1869)
- Black
- Andrea Jausas Lopez (1563)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandra Obolentseva (1869) and Andrea Jausas Lopez (1563) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandra Obolentseva games or Andrea Jausas Lopez games? This Alexandra Obolentseva vs Andrea Jausas Lopez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandra Obolentseva vs Andrea Jausas Lopez?
Alexandra Obolentseva vs Andrea Jausas Lopez (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexandra Obolentseva vs Andrea Jausas Lopez?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (ECO E43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandra Obolentseva vs Andrea Jausas Lopez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.