Katharina Oberpriller vs Cynthia Falke
DJEM U18 women, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Katharina Oberpriller vs Cynthia Falke with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Katharina Oberpriller (1666)
- Black
- Cynthia Falke (1681)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- DJEM U18 women
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Katharina Oberpriller (1666) and Cynthia Falke (1681) was played at DJEM U18 women in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Katharina Oberpriller games or Cynthia Falke games? This Katharina Oberpriller vs Cynthia Falke encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Katharina Oberpriller vs Cynthia Falke?
Katharina Oberpriller vs Cynthia Falke (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Cynthia Falke.
What opening was played in Katharina Oberpriller vs Cynthia Falke?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (ECO D45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Katharina Oberpriller vs Cynthia Falke, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.