Soren Federico Obando Guzman vs Jose Rene Cabiativa
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Soren Federico Obando Guzman vs Jose Rene Cabiativa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Soren Federico Obando Guzman (1827)
- Black
- Jose Rene Cabiativa (1662)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Soren Federico Obando Guzman (1827) and Jose Rene Cabiativa (1662) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Soren Federico Obando Guzman games or Jose Rene Cabiativa games? This Soren Federico Obando Guzman vs Jose Rene Cabiativa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Soren Federico Obando Guzman vs Jose Rene Cabiativa?
Soren Federico Obando Guzman vs Jose Rene Cabiativa finished 1–0, a win for Soren Federico Obando Guzman.
What opening was played in Soren Federico Obando Guzman vs Jose Rene Cabiativa?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Soren Federico Obando Guzman vs Jose Rene Cabiativa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.