Fernando Nunez Rocio vs Alexis Medina Almarales
2010 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fernando Nunez Rocio vs Alexis Medina Almarales with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fernando Nunez Rocio (2070)
- Black
- Alexis Medina Almarales (1962)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fernando Nunez Rocio (2070) and Alexis Medina Almarales (1962) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fernando Nunez Rocio games or Alexis Medina Almarales games? This Fernando Nunez Rocio vs Alexis Medina Almarales encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fernando Nunez Rocio vs Alexis Medina Almarales?
Fernando Nunez Rocio vs Alexis Medina Almarales (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Fernando Nunez Rocio vs Alexis Medina Almarales?
The game opened with the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (ECO A08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fernando Nunez Rocio vs Alexis Medina Almarales, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.