Maximo Nunez Portabales vs Joaquin Giralt Garcia
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maximo Nunez Portabales vs Joaquin Giralt Garcia with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maximo Nunez Portabales (1991)
- Black
- Joaquin Giralt Garcia (1870)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maximo Nunez Portabales (1991) and Joaquin Giralt Garcia (1870) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maximo Nunez Portabales games or Joaquin Giralt Garcia games? This Maximo Nunez Portabales vs Joaquin Giralt Garcia encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maximo Nunez Portabales vs Joaquin Giralt Garcia?
Maximo Nunez Portabales vs Joaquin Giralt Garcia finished 1–0, a win for Maximo Nunez Portabales.
What opening was played in Maximo Nunez Portabales vs Joaquin Giralt Garcia?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (ECO D38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maximo Nunez Portabales vs Joaquin Giralt Garcia, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.