Francisco Nunez Lucero vs Eduard Lopez Agustench
4. Sant Marti IM, 2012 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Nunez Lucero vs Eduard Lopez Agustench with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Nunez Lucero (2198)
- Black
- Eduard Lopez Agustench (2247)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4. Sant Marti IM
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Nunez Lucero (2198) and Eduard Lopez Agustench (2247) was played at 4. Sant Marti IM in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Nunez Lucero games or Eduard Lopez Agustench games? This Francisco Nunez Lucero vs Eduard Lopez Agustench encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Modern Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Nunez Lucero vs Eduard Lopez Agustench?
Francisco Nunez Lucero vs Eduard Lopez Agustench (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francisco Nunez Lucero vs Eduard Lopez Agustench?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Modern Line (ECO D11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Nunez Lucero vs Eduard Lopez Agustench, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.