Andrew Nugteren vs Joao Andresen
Corr IECC TH-Trio, 1996 · Result 0–1 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andrew Nugteren vs Joao Andresen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andrew Nugteren (1592)
- Black
- Joao Andresen
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr IECC TH-Trio
- Year
- 1996
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andrew Nugteren (1592) and Joao Andresen was played at Corr IECC TH-Trio in 1996 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andrew Nugteren games or Joao Andresen games? This Andrew Nugteren vs Joao Andresen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andrew Nugteren vs Joao Andresen?
Andrew Nugteren vs Joao Andresen (1996) finished 0–1, a win for Joao Andresen.
What opening was played in Andrew Nugteren vs Joao Andresen?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andrew Nugteren vs Joao Andresen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.