Nikolas Nuesken vs Arndt Kohlmann
GER Team Ch U16, 2003 · Result 1–0 · Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nikolas Nuesken vs Arndt Kohlmann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nikolas Nuesken (2209)
- Black
- Arndt Kohlmann (1992)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- GER Team Ch U16
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nikolas Nuesken (2209) and Arndt Kohlmann (1992) was played at GER Team Ch U16 in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nikolas Nuesken games or Arndt Kohlmann games? This Nikolas Nuesken vs Arndt Kohlmann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nikolas Nuesken vs Arndt Kohlmann?
Nikolas Nuesken vs Arndt Kohlmann (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Nikolas Nuesken.
What opening was played in Nikolas Nuesken vs Arndt Kohlmann?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (ECO C28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nikolas Nuesken vs Arndt Kohlmann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.