Igor Novoselov vs Anastasia Antipova
Botvinnik 100. Open, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Igor Novoselov vs Anastasia Antipova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Igor Novoselov (1588)
- Black
- Anastasia Antipova (1794)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Botvinnik 100. Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Igor Novoselov (1588) and Anastasia Antipova (1794) was played at Botvinnik 100. Open in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Igor Novoselov games or Anastasia Antipova games? This Igor Novoselov vs Anastasia Antipova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Igor Novoselov vs Anastasia Antipova?
Igor Novoselov vs Anastasia Antipova (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Anastasia Antipova.
What opening was played in Igor Novoselov vs Anastasia Antipova?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Igor Novoselov vs Anastasia Antipova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.