Amna Nouman vs Tigist Legesse Tulu
39. Olympiad women, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Amna Nouman vs Tigist Legesse Tulu with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Amna Nouman (1752)
- Black
- Tigist Legesse Tulu (1406)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 39. Olympiad women
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Amna Nouman (1752) and Tigist Legesse Tulu (1406) was played at 39. Olympiad women in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Amna Nouman games or Tigist Legesse Tulu games? This Amna Nouman vs Tigist Legesse Tulu encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Amna Nouman vs Tigist Legesse Tulu?
Amna Nouman vs Tigist Legesse Tulu (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Amna Nouman.
What opening was played in Amna Nouman vs Tigist Legesse Tulu?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (ECO C49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Amna Nouman vs Tigist Legesse Tulu, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.