Jean-Jacques Noe vs Jean-Claude Kieffer
2009 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jean-Jacques Noe vs Jean-Claude Kieffer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jean-Jacques Noe (1890)
- Black
- Jean-Claude Kieffer (1941)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jean-Jacques Noe (1890) and Jean-Claude Kieffer (1941) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jean-Jacques Noe games or Jean-Claude Kieffer games? This Jean-Jacques Noe vs Jean-Claude Kieffer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jean-Jacques Noe vs Jean-Claude Kieffer?
Jean-Jacques Noe vs Jean-Claude Kieffer (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jean-Jacques Noe vs Jean-Claude Kieffer?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO A34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jean-Jacques Noe vs Jean-Claude Kieffer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.