Maximilian Nitz vs Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio
MT-Bielecki/pr1, 2012 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66).
Analyze this game
Open Maximilian Nitz vs Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maximilian Nitz (1728)
- Black
- Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio (2023)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- MT-Bielecki/pr1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maximilian Nitz (1728) and Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio (2023) was played at MT-Bielecki/pr1 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maximilian Nitz games or Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio games? This Maximilian Nitz vs Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maximilian Nitz vs Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio?
Maximilian Nitz vs Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Maximilian Nitz.
What opening was played in Maximilian Nitz vs Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (ECO E66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maximilian Nitz vs Jorge Rodrigues Lúcio, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.